Agentic Delivery Lab
Your agents work. Your delivery process doesn't.
Most teams I talk to are stuck between "a few developers use Copilot" and "we don't dare go further". The lab gets one of your teams past that point in six weeks, in the tools you already use, with people still making the decisions.
1 of 3 pilot spots left for Q1 2027 · German or English · on site in Switzerland or remote
Run record · on the work item and the pull request
Run #142 · Story 5.006
Trigger Status → Ready · PO
Agent implementation · model pinned
Skills backend@1.4
Context ADR-007 · arc42 §5
Decision New dependency?
→ Awaiting decision
→ PO approved
Result PR #318 · 14 tests green
Cost 38 min · CHF 2.40
Every change answers three questions: who asked, who decided, why.
What this looks like in practice
Three teams I've built agentic delivery with, anonymized.
Why most agent pilots stall
The pilot usually works. The demo is impressive. Then it quietly stops.
In almost every case I've seen, the agent wasn't the problem. Nobody had decided who reviews its work, when it should stop and ask, or what an item is allowed to cost. And the architecture it was supposed to respect only existed in the heads of three senior people.
Agents don't fail at the model. They fail at missing process, and at architecture they can't read.
That's why I treat agentic delivery as a change in how a team works, not as a tooling rollout. More on that in The Agentic Operating Model – Eleven Realities.
How the lab works
Six weeks, one team, and 5–10 items from your real backlog. No sandbox and no toy project.
What your team has after six weeks
- An agent flow running in your toolchain, from Ready to pull request
- A team that actually works with it, not just one enthusiast
- Measured results: lead time, cost per item, and how often a person had to step in
- A decision policy and a run record on every item
- A plan for rolling it out to the next teams
No black-box agents
Your platform already logs what happened. The lab adds who decided and why, the same way in Azure DevOps, Jira, GitHub and GitLab. It's built in from day one.
Agents run in your environment, on your runners. I don't host your code.
Who you'd work with
I'm Patrick Roos, a software architect and the author of workingsoftware.dev.
I'm not advising on this from the outside. I build agentic delivery systems with teams, from a two-person startup to an SME with a 16-person product team: agents that take work items through refinement, implementation, review and testing, inside real toolchains with all their access rules, plus architecture documentation that agents can actually use. The lab packages what I've learned there, so your team doesn't have to learn it the slow way.
The pilot spots are for teams that want to help shape the lab. You get a reduced price, I get a reference and an anonymized case study.
Further reading
What you can book
Every team starts from a different place, so I quote after a first call. Prices are fixed, not hourly, and model and token costs are billed directly by your provider.
All prices on request. Book a 30-minute call and you'll get a fixed offer for your team.
Questions
Do we need new tools?
No. The lab works in Azure DevOps, Jira and Confluence, GitHub or GitLab, whichever you already use.
Does our code leave the company?
Not to me. Agents run in your environment. Which model provider you use, and where, including data protection under the nDSG, is settled in week 0.
Isn't this just Copilot with extra steps?
Copilot helps one developer write code faster. The lab changes how a team delivers: who decides, who reviews and what gets measured.
What happens after the first three months of Agent Care?
It continues monthly per team, and you can cancel at any time.
On site or remote?
Both. The three days in week 1 can happen at your office or remotely, and the weekly check-ins are usually remote.
German or English?
Both. Workshops, documents and calls are in whatever language your team works in.
Let's talk for 30 minutes
Tell me where agents are stuck in your team. I'll tell you honestly whether the lab is a good fit, or whether something smaller makes more sense.